Blogroll Me! How This Old Brit Sees It ...: Ref: <i>appletree's</i> ~ For Israelis, no atrocity is too great: officer says he was right to shoot a 13-year-old child: UPDATED

17 January 2009

Ref: appletree's ~ For Israelis, no atrocity is too great: officer says he was right to shoot a 13-year-old child: UPDATED


(photo source)

Regular readers will know that (appletree's) Gordo (our good blogger buddy from Oregon) and ourselves often cross post pieces at each other's blogs. Well, we're (pretty safely) assuming that in this instance Gordo simply forgot to cross post this particular piece - so we are, shall we say, 'using our initiative''...

From the Guardian:

An Israeli army officer who repeatedly shot a 13-year-old Palestinian girl in Gaza dismissed a warning from another soldier that she was a child by saying he would have killed her even if she was three years old.

The officer, identified by the army only as Captain R, was charged this week with illegal use of his weapon, conduct unbecoming an officer and other relatively minor infractions after emptying all 10 bullets from his gun's magazine into Iman al-Hams when she walked into a "security area" on the edge of Rafah refugee camp last month.

A tape recording of radio exchanges between soldiers involved in the incident, played on Israeli television, contradicts the army's account of the events and appears to show that the captain shot the girl in cold blood.

The official account claimed that Iman was shot as she walked towards an army post with her schoolbag because soldiers feared she was carrying a bomb.

But the tape recording of the radio conversation between soldiers at the scene reveals that, from the beginning, she was identified as a child and at no point was a bomb spoken about nor was she described as a threat. Iman was also at least 100 yards from any soldier.

Instead, the tape shows that the soldiers swiftly identified her as a "girl of about 10" who was "scared to death".

The tape also reveals that the soldiers said Iman was headed eastwards, away from the army post and back into the refugee camp, when she was shot.

At that point, Captain R took the unusual decision to leave the post in pursuit of the girl. He shot her dead and then "confirmed the kill" by emptying his magazine into her body.

The tape recording is of a three-way conversation between the army watchtower, the army post's operations room and the captain, who was a company commander.

The soldier in the watchtower radioed his colleagues after he saw Iman: "It's a little girl. She's running defensively eastward."

Operations room: "Are we talking about a girl under the age of 10?"

Watchtower: "A girl of about 10, she's behind the embankment, scared to death."

A few minutes later, Iman is shot in the leg from one of the army posts.

The watchtower: "I think that one of the positions took her out."

The company commander then moves in as Iman lies wounded and helpless.

Captain R: "I and another soldier ... are going in a little nearer, forward, to confirm the kill ... Receive a situation report. We fired and killed her ... I also confirmed the kill. Over."

Witnesses described how the captain shot Iman twice in the head, walked away, turned back and fired a stream of bullets into her body. Doctors at Rafah's hospital said she had been shot at least 17 times.

On the tape, the company commander then "clarifies" why he killed Iman: "This is commander. Anything that's mobile, that moves in the zone, even if it's a three-year-old, needs to be killed. Over."

The army's original account of the killing said that the soldiers only identified Iman as a child after she was first shot. But the tape shows that they were aware just how young the small, slight girl was before any shots were fired.

The case came to light after soldiers under the command of Captain R went to an Israeli newspaper to accuse the army of covering up the circumstances of the killing.

A subsequent investigation by the officer responsible for the Gaza strip, Major General Dan Harel, concluded that the captain had "not acted unethically".

However, the military police launched an investigation, which resulted in charges against the unit commander.

Iman's parents have accused the army of whitewashing the affair by filing minor charges against Captain R. They want him prosecuted for murder.

Naturally, the first impulse of the Israeli Defense Force was to lie and attempt to cover up the incident. When they were forced to acknowledge what really happened, the IDF reacted by charging the officer with relatively minor crimes.

The message to the Israeli troops is clear: no crime is too monstrous, as long as it is committed against a Palestinian.
===================================

Now, having read and wept, and probably raged, we urge you to see *GORDO'S UPDATE, which we fervently believe makes matters much worse.

Labels: , , , , , , ,

3 Comments:

Blogger A'Jay said...

The sad thing is Richard though this is an old article... the attitude prevails in Israel.

"Israel stands accused of perpetrating a series of war crimes during a sustained 12-hour assault on a village in southern Gaza last week in which 14 people died.

In testimony collected from residents of the village of Khuza'a by the Observer, it is claimed that Israeli soldiers entering the village:

• attempted to bulldoze houses with civilians inside;

• killed civilians trying to escape under the protection of white flags;

• opened fire on an ambulance attempting to reach the wounded;

• used indiscriminate force in a civilian area and fired white phosphorus shells.

If the allegations are upheld, all the incidents would constitute breaches of the Geneva conventions.

The denunciations over what happened in Khuza'a follow repeated claims of possible human rights violations from the Red Cross, the UN and human rights organisations."

I'm afraid a Palestinian life is very cheap, unless you are an IDF soldier being paid and promoted for ending one.... even a child

10:08 am  
Anonymous bootlean said...

He returned to service, was promoted to major, and paid $20,000 plus legal expenses to compensate him for the trouble that this little girl caused him. ?????

So much for those that try to excuse or use the defence that there are always "rougue" elements in any military. The treat b*satrds like these as though they're heroes.

Judge people by the company they keep is still a pretty good yardstick if anyone asks me.

1:19 pm  
Anonymous Rex said...

Today I had a conversation about Israel and Gaza with a neighbour who's lived down the road for 31 years. We've always gotten along fine as have our wives. After hearing his ignorant tirade regarding how it's the Israelis whov'e been so badly treated by the Palestinians over the years, and the Arabs deserve all they get -- we wont be having any more conversations. I told him so in no uncertain terms.

1:38 am  

Post a Comment

COMMENTS and Links to this post:

Create a Link

<< Home