12 February 2008
Previous Posts
- Completely Uncalled For Religious Controversy Caus...
- Can Great Britain's Greatest Athletes Be 'Commande...
- 'InfraGard ': Lincensed To Kill Americans In Ameri...
- Bush says Obama and Clinton threaten peace and pro...
- AIDS Turns Politicians into Thugs, Idiots, and Liars
- US & UK Afghanistan Adventure : Latest On Escalati...
- Gordon Brown And Condi Rice:Absent Afghanistan All...
- Prince Andrew Asks Why US Ignored UK Advice Re : I...
- Israel Threatens To Demolish 700 Year Old Mosque B...
- Super Tuesday? As Far As We're Concerned You Can ...
5 Comments:
We just need someone to parody it Clinton-wise and we'll have the three-ring circus that these primaries have become.
"Send in the clowns!
Don't bother they'rehere."
Shame the sound quality isn't better.
What kind of people would wish for a leader who finds it amusing to join in singing "Bomb, bomb, bomb Iraq!"
Never mind, don't bother telling me. I already know, as does most of the civilized world.
Disgust isn't a strong enough word.
So what makes anyone think Obama's likely to do anything about American's [virtually national passtime] of illegal and muderously agrresive international adventures?
anon2--
There's a huge difference between Bush and his predecessors. Clinton was accused, rightly, of international aggression when he bombed Iraq, but there's a vast gulf between the amount of suffering he created and the amount created by Bush. You simply cannot reasonably equate Operation Desert Fox with the invasion and occupation of Iraq.
And Obama was an outspoken critic of the Iraq war from the beginning. It's always been his position that military force should be a last resort and that the US should, whenever possible, seek to act through international coalitions.
I don't think that Obama will almost certainly have a policy that is more aggressive than I could support, but the evidence shows that Obama will be far less eager than Bush or McCain to enter into war.
Post a Comment
<< Home