Blogroll Me! How This Old Brit Sees It ...: President Hilary Clinton; True Or False Or True Or False Or True Or False Or True Or ...?

13 April 2007

President Hilary Clinton; True Or False Or True Or False Or True Or False Or True Or ...?

*
Quite some time ago we were asked by an angry (and alarmingly aggressive), American elsewhere on line: "Since when did damned foreigners have the right to pass opinions on possible future US presidents?"

Our answer was short & sweet.


"Since the day the US decided it wanted to rule the whole damned world," we said.

To date, our personal stance on said subject still hasn't altered at all.

Of course we don't want the Republican party still in power after the next US presidential election. That should go without saying.


And of course we'd much, much, much prefer that the Democratic party was presented with a mandate to put one of it's people into the White House.

But -- the proper person -- not just some one wearing the proper colours.

So, it's with that in mind that we want you to watch this.



Isn't it about time the American people stopped to think a little? And to remember a little?


Then, to put someone in charge who would honestly & truly put the American people first?

Instead of any prospective candidate who serially and unashamedly sought through (same-old, same-old) phony political practices (like never ending flip-flops) to primarily serve themselves?

Well, we know what we think.

We bet you know, too.

*

Labels: ,

14 Comments:

Anonymous Anonymous said...

Typical.

All politicians rely on the electorate having short memories ~ and they're always proved right. Hence they hold onto their 'jobs' even though they'd have no chance of doing so if they were in any other business.

12:13 am  
Anonymous Anonymous said...

snoopsnuffleopagus sez

Ron Paul 4 Prez, our last chance!

1:39 am  
Anonymous Tom V said...

I bet Richard, that during all these times and reversals one thing did remained constant in her political standing:
The undieing, unconditional support of Israel and Zionist causes, doesn't matter if it shines or rains, or if it is deeply detrimental, or even in opposition to American interests.

3:34 pm  
Anonymous Charles said...

The best man for the ordinary people? Easy peasy. But for that very reason - he won't be allowed to get it. Denis Kucinic.

10:00 pm  
Anonymous St!ff M!ttens said...

Here here, Charles.

I don't relish the prospect of voting against Rudy, John or Mitt if that means voting for Hillary. I think Lewis Black said it best: The difference between the Republicans and the Democrats is that the Republicans suck and the Democrats blow.

5:16 pm  
Anonymous denk said...

***"
old brit says
Since the day the US decided it wanted to rule the whole damned world,"
***

lol
the yanks are really insufferable [with due respect to tom v etc], they reserve the "right" to sabotage, arrange coups, bomb, invade any god damned country they so please, but those damned foreigners better stay out of their "internal affairs". !!

the yanks idea of "internal affairs" includes inviting dissident politicians from china to give speech at the "hill" or the senate. HIS MAJESTY THE DALAI LAMA for example, is a must do item in any newly elected us prez itinerary, to show the us "solidarity with the oppressed tibetan people". [sic]
if tibet is such a hell hole [oh, "there's an ongoing genocide in tibet" accoding to the yanks], i wonder what should we make of places like india's socalled north east, aka the tibet that nobody want to talk about, or kashmir? but you never see folks from these god forsaken places invited to the "hill" or the senate house to tell those esteemed gents what they think about life in shangrila -- oh, i supposed that would be a gross violation of indian sovereinty wouldnt it?

another favourite at the "hill" is hongkong dissident martin lee, who has been kinda thorn in beijing's side. he got lots of standing ovation at the hill talking about freedom and democracy and how ccp sucks in general. beijing barely tolerated his performance while hk was still under british rule, but when the performance continued after hk return to china in 1997, china asked washington to stop interferring in its internal affair.
what insolence !
the yanks replied indignantly, "This is an internal affair for Washington. China has no right to interfere".[that article actually came under the title "china should mind its own business" when first published ]
in other words, the yanks told china that its the us "internal affair" to invite any chinese dissidents to the usa to tell the world how ccp sucks, any chinese protest on this matter is an interferrance in the us "internal
affair".
those yanks, sometimes i dont know whether to laugh or cry.

4:27 am  
Anonymous Tom V said...

denk you are correct, and you gave an excellent and important addition to the body of comments, by pointing out the American govenment's brazen imperial haughtiness worldwide, on behalf of its establishment.

However, it is Israel and in its conflict with its neighbourhood, where there is an important exception lies:

It is in this instance, where America subordinates its own interest under pressure, by the extraordinarly powerful domestic Zionist lobby. It is one of the defining constant of American politics in about a generation now, to swear and maintain unconditional fealty to these forces, as a precondition of one's political existence in Washington.

In conclusion the phenomenons each of us have described, are both valid and readily observable daily. That is, they exist in parallel to each other.

8:42 pm  
Anonymous denk said...

Tom v,

Meet the Axis Of The Apocalyptic

7:29 am  
Anonymous Jim DeRosa said...

wasn't she too, lied to.

9:45 pm  
Anonymous martha said...

jim, millions of us knew we were being lied to. That means Hilary is too naieve to lead Americans (or any others) and has shockingly poor judgement. Just more reasons she shouldn't be the one. America needs and deserves better than Hilary Clinton ~ especially now.

10:50 pm  
Blogger Sophia said...

Not Hillary, she is the most ungracious woman in Politics I have known, even more than Margaret Thatcher.

8:34 pm  
Anonymous Rosemary said...

Thanks, denk, for linking that "Axis of the Apocalyptic" article.

I have no use for Hillary. The American press has been trying to tell us she is the front runner almost since the day she announced.

The Democratic Party was able to manipulate things to keep out all other Dem party candidates in 2004 except the anointed one (Kerry). In most of the state Primary Elections, Democrats were left to vote as if they were placing bets on a horse race. Then they made sure by not even allowing any debate at the party Convention or any signs or the wearing of any political pins or T-shirts promoting any other candidate so the TV viewers would believe he was the unanimous choice.

They had better not try that again!

2:36 am  
Anonymous denk said...

hello Rosemary,

Actually the axis has been expanding rapidly under us patronage, uncle sham has such a morbid fetishism with military stuff so that whenever he goes, he is either setting up more bases or organising armed posse. for this past months, hardly a day goes by without some "defence" pact being signed in this part of the world, the latest one is between australia and japan. Looks like uncle sham and buddies are “creeping” towards a de facto “asian nato” – if the move isn’t so transparent for all to see why would they trot out the same disclaimer every time a new pact is signed , that “this has nothing to do with china blah blah blah so the chinese shouldn’t get worried unduly” [wink wink]
India has always been
infatuated with the big boys
, they don’t call india the “Israel of south asia” or the “usa of south asia” for nothing here.
But japan is supposed to be a “peace loving” country since wwii so what’s a nice girl like her doing in this business eh?
may be japan is sick of being a "nice" girl [that damned article 9]for so long and just want to be herself?

6:17 pm  
Anonymous Anonymous said...

lol - 4.27 am

this guy seems to be an apologist for the communist, and this after america has given the communist some of their advanced industries.
china interferes in northeast india and elsewhere and is one place that won't allow people it does not consider equal to chinese to have citizenship, ut seems to object should someone say the same about its people as citizens of other nations.

12:30 pm  

Post a Comment

COMMENTS and Links to this post:

Create a Link

<< Home